SPRY has been awarded 17 badges in G2 Winter 2025 reports.
Read about it in our press release.
Learn more
EMRs and EHRs are vital tools in physical therapy that serve different purposes. EMRs manage patient records within a clinic, while EHRs enable seamless sharing of patient information across providers. This blog breaks down the differences between the two, the benefits of each, and how systems like SPRY are improving PT clinic management for better patient care and efficiency.
If you’re running a physical therapy practice, you know how crucial it is to stay on top of your documentation. Whether you're tracking patient progress or collaborating with other healthcare providers, the right technology can make all the difference. In fact, around 88% of office-based physicians have adopted EMR or EHR systems to streamline their operations. While the terms EMR and EHR are often used interchangeably, they play distinct roles in healthcare record-keeping.
Understanding these differences can help you choose the right system to improve patient care and optimize your practice. Let’s dive deeper into what these are and sets them apart.
An Electronic Medical Record (EMR) serves as your clinic’s internal record-keeping system—a digital version of a patient's chart that remains within your practice. It's designed to document patient treatments, diagnoses, and progress, but it has limitations when it comes to transferring information between different providers.
Thanks to the convenience that EMRs offer for storing patient data, the EMR solutions market reached $17.6 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow to $32.3 billion by 2033.
You can think of an EMR as the digital equivalent of the old-school patient charts kept in a filing cabinet. It’s specific to your physical therapy (PT) practice and is primarily intended for internal use. This means that when patients move on to another provider, their EMR does not travel with them.
For instance, consider a patient recovering from a knee injury. Their EMR contains crucial details such as the treatment plan, progress reports, and notes from each session—all conveniently stored in one place. However, if that patient needs to see a specialist for an unrelated issue, their EMR records are not easily transferable. In this case, therapists must either print or manually send the records, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors.
While an EMR excels at managing patient care within your clinic, its main limitation lies in the difficulty of sharing information with other healthcare providers.
In summary, an EMR is ideal for ensuring efficient operations within your practice, but it can create roadblocks when patients require care outside your clinic.
An Electronic Health Record (EHR), on the other hand, goes beyond the walls of your clinic. It’s a more comprehensive system designed for interoperability, meaning it follows the patient across various healthcare providers. Whether a patient visits a primary care doctor, a specialist, or another PT clinic, their EHR travels with them, ensuring coordinated and informed care.
The EHR market was valued at about $34 billion in 2023 and is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.4%, potentially reaching around $64.5 billion by 2032.
Let's take the same scenario as above but with one change. The patient with the knee injury also sees a cardiologist for an unrelated condition. With an EHR, the cardiologist, physical therapist, and any other provider involved can access the same set of records, allowing seamless communication and better-coordinated care.
It’s like having a cloud-based system where everyone gets to see the same playbook, no matter where they are in the healthcare system. According to the latest reports, primary physicians are spending 30 minutes more on EHR to understand patient history compared to 2020.
With an EHR, continuity of care becomes a lot more streamlined, making it a game-changer for patient outcomes.
Here’s a more detailed explanation of the key differences between EMRs and EHRs:
EMRs are designed for internal use within a single healthcare practice, focusing on clinical data specific to that organization. In contrast, EHRs are built for sharing across multiple providers, allowing a comprehensive view of a patient's health across different care settings. This enhanced interoperability fosters better continuity of care.
EMRs primarily track clinical information, whereas EHRs take a broader, holistic approach, incorporating details such as patient preferences, social factors, and care plans. EHRs empower patients to actively engage with their health data, supporting a more personalized treatment approach.
EHRs are designed for easy data sharing across systems, supporting seamless communication between providers. EMRs, on the other hand, often face challenges in sharing data due to compatibility issues, limiting collaboration between healthcare facilities.
EHRs offer advanced reporting and analytics tools, providing healthcare professionals with actionable insights for improving patient outcomes and managing population health. EMRs, while efficient in internal record-keeping, lack the broader analytical capabilities that EHRs provide.
If you’d prefer a quick overview, check out the table below for a detailed comparison.
Both EMRs and EHRs contribute to better patient outcomes by ensuring more accurate, coordinated care. EMRs improve internal clinical workflows within a practice, providing easy access to patient data. EHRs take this a step further, allowing healthcare providers to share patient information across multiple facilities, which ensures continuity of care, especially when patients visit different specialists or healthcare providers.
EMRs streamline the management of patient records within a single practice, significantly reducing paperwork and minimizing errors. On the other hand, EHRs, with their interoperability, allow for seamless collaboration between different healthcare providers. This eliminates manual data transfers, allowing for real-time updates in patient records, thereby improving overall practice efficiency.
One of the key advantages of EHRs is their ability to engage patients directly through patient portals. These portals give individuals access to their own health data, enabling them to track their progress, manage their treatment plans, and communicate effectively with their healthcare providers. This level of engagement empowers patients to take an active role in their health management.
EHRs come equipped with advanced reporting tools that allow healthcare providers to generate detailed reports, track trends, and monitor patient outcomes. These analytics help providers improve treatment strategies, optimize resource allocation, and support initiatives related to population health management. EMRs, while beneficial in-house, are more limited in their reporting capabilities compared to EHRs.
Both EMRs and EHRs offer financial benefits by improving the efficiency of billing, coding, and claims management. EHRs, through their integration with billing systems, make it easier for healthcare providers to track reimbursements, minimize claim denials, and ensure compliance with healthcare regulations such as HIPAA. This leads to improved financial performance for practices.
SPRY offers a comprehensive EMR solution tailored specifically for physical therapy clinics. With SPRY's EMR, you'll experience the benefits of a streamlined, intuitive system that:
SPRY’s EMR system is designed to meet the specific needs of PT practices, combining ease of use with powerful features that enhance both patient care and operational efficiency.
Learn more about how SPRY’s EMR can transform your clinic's workflow and patient outcomes! Read our blogs to learn more about PT documentation tools.
Reduce costs and improve your reimbursement rate with a modern, all-in-one clinic management software.
Get a Demo
.png)
.png)